Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Essay Topics That Encourage Persuasive Argumentation

Essay Topics That Encourage Persuasive ArgumentationThere are a number of ways to write good, well structured and persuasive essays for your school essay topics. In this article, I will discuss several of the most common approach you can take in order to make your essays as persuasive as possible.You need to make sure that the essay topic itself contains enough keywords or key words that will help you locate the essay in a search engine. Of course, you also need to avoid using any inappropriate keywords. For example, it is perfectly acceptable to use the terms 'gender', 'sexuality 'religion' in an essay topic about one of these three topics, but use the word 'police' instead if it is used in relation to an organization. This can be an excellent way to stand out from the crowd and get the attention from the online readers.Besides keyword research, you also need to make sure that the essay contains enough key words in order to organize and structure the text. Each article is obviously different and there will be specific types of essays that contain more relevant key words that you will want to consider. In fact, some sites will allow you to organize your essay topics by category and then categorize the key words by specific topics.In addition to organizing your essay topics, you should also think about how to use the key words in order to support the topic. Keywords are much more important than you may realize. You may not know this, but when an essay gets poorly written with keywords used in poor contexts, it becomes much more difficult to follow and understand the essay.You should also make sure that the keywords you use are strategically placed. Key words should not be scattered throughout the essay. Instead, you should use them to support the main theme of the essay. A good example of this is a single key word could support different themes depending on the context. In addition to organizing your essay topics, you should also think about what sub-topics you will include. Sub-topics should be chosen carefully, because this can often affect the ability to retain the information and may even impact your essay's ability to be read. Therefore, you should always make sure that your essay has at least one sub-topic that is very relevant to the essay topic.The most important thing you can do is keep an eye on the usage of your keywords. As you start writing, you will soon find that using proper key words will help you to make better-written essays that contain persuasive rhetoric and engaging content.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Notional Agreement in Grammar Definition and Examples

In English grammar, notional agreement refers to  agreement (or concord) of verbs with their subjects and of pronouns with their antecedent nouns on the basis of meaning rather than grammatical form. Also known as synesis. (Other terms for notional agreement include  notional concord, semantic agreement, agreement ad sensum, logical agreement, and constructio ad sensum.) Some common cases of notional agreement involve (1) collective nouns (for example, family); (2) plural expressions of quantity (five years); (3) plural proper nouns (United States); and (4) some compound units with and (bed and breakfast). For a discussion of agreement with collective nouns (in American English and in British English), see American English. Examples and Observations I know that our Government are letting our troops down, big time.(Jacqui Janes to Prime Minister Gordon Brown, quoted by Philip Webster, Emotional Gordon Brown on Defensive. The Times [UK], Nov. 10, 2009)Correctly, we suspect that the system is rigged, our government has  become coin-operated and that  weve been sidelined.(Wendell Potter and Nick Penniman, Nation on the Take.  Bloomsbury Press [US], 2016)None of them were in court to hear the judges uphold their appeal.(Steven Erlanger, Terror Convictions Overturned in France. The New York Times, Feb. 24, 2009)Eric Idle, Michael Palin and Terry Jones gave evidence in court while the other two surviving members, Gilliam and John Cleese, gave written evidence. None of them was in court to hear the ruling.(Haroon Siddique, Monty Python Film Producer Wins Royalties Case Against Comedy Team. The Guardian [UK], July 5, 2013)Over on Englands south coast, the surfers of Bournemouth are just as keen as those in Cornwall, but suffer one big disadvantage: the coast gets very poor-quality waves. But Bournemouth borough council were not prepared to let this prevent them from encouraging surfers, and their wallets, to visit.(Alf Alderson, Could the Perfect Wave for Surfing Be Artificial--and in Bournemouth? The Guardian [UK], Nov. 9, 2009)But everybody has their failing, you know; and everybody has a right to do what they like with their own money.(Isabella Thorpe in Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen, 1817) Notional Agreement With Certain Plural Nouns and Collective Nouns Formally plural nouns such as news, means, and politics have long taken singular verbs; so when a plural noun considered a single entity takes a singular verb, notional agreement is at work and no one objects [the United States is sending its ambassador]. When a singular noun is used as a collective noun and takes a plural verb or a plural pronoun, we also have notional agreement [the committee are meeting on Tuesday] [the group wants to publicize their views]. Indefinite pronouns are heavily influenced by notional agreement and tend to take singular verbs but plural pronouns [everyone is required to show their identification].  (Merriam-Websters Manual for Writers and Editors, rev. ed. Merriam-Webster, 1998) Notional Agreement With Fact Expressions Many cars on the roads means many traffic accidents. Behind the plural expression there appears to lie a singular concept which explains the selection of the -s form of the verb. Reference is made to a fact of circumstance, and the meaning of the plural subject expression can therefore be captured by the paraphrase The fact that there is/are X. Plural fact expressions are particularly common in sentences where the predicator is realized by mean (or related verbs like entail, imply, involve), but we find it in sentences with other verbs as well: High production costs prevents reasonable consumer prices. ​(Carl Bache, Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Walter de Gruyter, 2000) Notional Agreement With Plus When mathematical equations are pronounced as English sentences, the verb is usually in the singular: Two plus two is (or equals) four. By the same token, subjects containing two noun phrases joined by plus are usually construed as singular: The construction slowdown plus the bad weather has made for a weak market. This observation has led some to argue that in these sentences, plus functions as a preposition meaning in addition to. . . . It makes more sense to view plus in these uses as a conjunction that joins two subjects into a single entity requiring a single verb by notional agreement.(One Hundred Words Almost Everyone Confuses and Misuses. Houghton, 2004) Notional Agreement With Phrases Such As One in Six and One in 10 Phrases of this sort should be treated as plural. There are good grammatical and logical reasons for this. Compare more than one in six Japanese is 65 or older... with more than one in six Japanese are 65 or older.. Grammatically, we are talking not about the noun one but the noun phrase one in six, signifying a group of people. Logically, the phrase represents a proportion--just like 17% or one-sixth, both of which take plural verbs. Two out of every seven and three out of 10 take plurals too, functioning identically.(David Marsh and Amelia Hodsdon, Guardian Style, 3rd ed. Guardian Books, 2010)

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Emotional Intelligence And Organizational Leadership

Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Leadership Various authors have been debating the issue of emotional intelligence and organizational leadership. However, the existing discourse on the matter has been hampered in terms of limited theoretical applications. Moreover, many analysts have failed to propose effective relationships among constructs, thus failing to offer any meaningful relationship between emotional intelligence and organizational leadership. Nevertheless, many authors offer a candid evaluation of the issue in terms of discussing empirical data although few of them create a relationship between organizational leadership and emotional intelligence. By considering the work of Dabke (2014) for instance, the author is†¦show more content†¦This assertion makes his studies inconsistent. By recommending further study in the analysis of emotional intelligence, the author contracts his empirical result. The results indicated that participants believe that organizational leaders can use emotional intelligence for recruiting staff. Lack of theories in this work also makes it deficient. Al Noor’s work gives a detailed discussion of leadership styles in relationship to emotional intelligence. The author decided to consider gender differences in the way leaders manage their organizations. By discussing transactional and leadership styles about emotional intelligence, this work can illustrate how female leaders score higher when it comes to emotional mentoring (Noor, 2011). The author’s work gives a more meaningful discussion of the relationship between emotional intelligence and organizational leadership. Moreover, he presents a better theoretical basis for his ideas. He uses contingency theory as well as situational ethics in his analysis. The author is quite consistent in his analysis and avoids overdependence on empirical data even as he forms his opinion on the issue. Most of the works in this analysis focused on discussing research findings. The decision of the author to combine empirical research and scholarly review distinguishes his work from others that discuss the relationship between emotional intelligence and organizational leadership. The discussion of Zheng, et al. (2015) is broad-based

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Similarities and Differences Between free essay sample

They were arrested, placed in custody, tried, as well as, imprisoned in the same facilities that housed adult offenders. Punishment was the primary goal when it came to the handling of either of these offenders, now the juvenile system focuses on rehabilitation whereas; the focus in the criminal system remains punishment. In 1899 the first juvenile court was founded in Cook County Illinois (Findlaw. com, n. d. ), it was at time policies began to change along with the manner in which juvenile offenders were treated in comparison to adult offenders. Both systems continue to provide procedural safeguards to protect the rights of the offender upon admitting guilt. These procedures include; the right to an attorney, the right against self-incrimination, the right to cross exam witnesses, the right to be notified of the charges being brought against them and the prosecutions requirement to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, rights to plea bargain and the right to hearings and appeals (Legal match, n. We will write a custom essay sample on Similarities and Differences Between or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page d. ). The rights afforded to any offender is an important right and should be in place in any court proceeding. Although juvenile proceedings are not generally viewed as criminal both juvenile and adult offenders are entitled to be represented by court appointed attorneys. In contrast, the person appointed to represent the juvenile offender advocates for what is in the best interest of the juvenile, while the attorney appointed for the adult offender seeks to obtain the lowest sentence possible for the crime. Juveniles that are tried in juvenile courts cannot be sentence to adult jails or prisons, although more serious crimes against property or persons can be referred to criminal courts (Seigel amp; Welsh, 2010). Juveniles involved in less serious crimes JUVENILE V CRIMINAL 3 such as shoplifting and runaways, have been diverted from court action. Court proceedings for juveniles as well as the records are sealed and not available to the public, while adult criminal proceedings and records are deemed public. Officers also deal with juvenile and adult offenders differently. They have several options when dealing with a juvenile offender; they may release the juvenile with a simple warning, they may also release the juvenile and file a report on the contact they had with them, they have the option to take the juvenile to the police station and make referrals to outside programs like youth services, they may also refer the juvenile to juvenile court intake either with or without detention. In dealing with adult criminal cases the options of officers pale in comparison, they offender is either arrested or released with a warning. Once in custody of the police, juvenile are generally released to the custody of their parent or guardians and adult offenders are offered the opportunity to pay bail. Parents in juvenile proceeding have a greater involvement in the trial process where in the adult process; parental involvement is minimal if at all. With significant similarities and differences between the two systems, the need becomes clear that adults and youth offend differently and for different reasons, and should also be punished and rehabilitated differently. While the courts operate separately and independently of each other, the goal of punishment should remain the same with rehabilitation as an option for the offenders that could truly benefit from the program. Juveniles today do not fear the system and therefore continue to offend. With distinctly different physical and psychological needs of juvenile and adult offenders, it is clear that the solution should be equally different. Juveniles should remain in separate facilities and continue to journey on the road to rehabilitation. Having juvenile and adult offenders housed in the same facility would only endanger the lives of the juveniles, by placing them around violent adult criminals who have been convicted of serious crimes such as murder, potentially in harms way. The differences clearly justify having separate court systems and we should continue to progress and grow with the ever changing needs of each type of offender.